首页> 外文OA文献 >Large Teams Have Developed Science and Technology; Small Teams Have Disrupted It
【2h】

Large Teams Have Developed Science and Technology; Small Teams Have Disrupted It

机译:大型团队开发了科学技术;小团队有   打乱了它

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Teams dominate the production of high-impact science and technology.Analyzing teamwork from more than 50 million papers, patents, and softwareproducts, 1954-2014, we demonstrate across this period that larger teamsdeveloped recent, popular ideas, while small teams disrupted the system bydrawing on older and less prevalent ideas. Attention to work from large teamscame immediately, while advances by small teams succeeded further into thefuture. Differences between small and large teams magnify with impact - smallteams have become known for disruptive work and large teams for developingwork. Differences in topic and re- search design account for part of therelationship between team size and disruption, but most of the effect occurswithin people, controlling for detailed subject and article type. Our findingssuggest the importance of supporting both small and large teams for thesustainable vitality of science and technology.
机译:团队主导着高影响力的科学技术的生产。从1954年至2014年,通过分析超过5,000万篇论文,专利和软件产品的团队合作,我们证明了在此期间,较大的团队提出了近期流行的想法,而小型团队则通过抽签破坏了系统关于较旧且较不流行的想法。大型团队的工作立即引起了人们的注意,而小型团队的进步则进一步推动了这一趋势的发展。小型团队和大型团队之间的差异会扩大影响力-小型团队因破坏性工作而闻名,大型团队因开展工作而闻名。主题和研究设计的差异是团队规模与破坏之间关系的部分原因,但是大多数影响发生在人们内部,控制着详细的主题和文章类型。我们的发现表明,支持小型和大型团队对科学技术的可持续发展至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号